Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. "
Results 5401 - 5420
of 8,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
The United States needs a constitutional amendment. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Assemblyman V. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 7:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
That’s the position of the states that are hostile to President Biden, and about half the states of the Union signed on to a brief challenging this rule. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
We believe that a trade agreement, drafted correctly, would benefit the United States on the one hand, and the countries of Central America and the Dominican Republic, on the other. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am
In 1881, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Egbert v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:56 pm
” But as the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342, 246 Fed.Appx. 7 (2d Cir.2007) (same). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm
The resulting federal court victory in Thompson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
We reject that result because the United States Constitution cannot properly be so interpreted. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:28 am
According to the USPTO website, a patent is a property right granted by the Government of the United States of America to an inventor “to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States” for a limited time in exchange for public disclosure of the invention when the patent is granted. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:58 pm
As Justice Stevens noted in Hamdan v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:23 am
Notable Events of the Week: “President Biden warned President Vladimir V. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
