Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 5401 - 5420 of 8,558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
Dr Smith said his patient told him "untruths" about his actual condition.The doctor said that he would not have agreed to it had he known the situation.On hearing this, Lord Doherty called the document invalid. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:15 am
State: The CCA upheld Russeau's Smith County death sentence after a remand for a new punishment hearing. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:03 am by Eleonora Rosati
SHORTSTV scope too slim to stop YouTube ShortsShorts International Ltd v Google LLC [2024] EWHC 2738 (Ch) (October 2024)Google was sued for its use of “shorts” in the context of YouTube shorts, which are exactly what you’d expect – short videos. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Smith of the Provincial Court of British Columbia dated September 26, 2016. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:54 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., No. 1:13 CV 1220, 2013 U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog only. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:50 am by Marie Louise
(Kluwer Patent Blog) US: Abraxis Biosciences v Navinta en banc denied – looking back to DBB, forward to Stanford/Roche (IPBiz) US: W D Washington denies preliminary injunction in biotech trademark dispute: Mirina Corp. v Marina Biotech (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US: Issues to consider when structuring medical device development and license agreements (IP Spotlight) US: Have you benefited from public access to PubMed? [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
” In Smith v Smith, (1987) 12 RFL (3d) 50 (BCSC), the court held that a 20-year-old unemployed high school dropout with aspirations of a career in modelling continued to qualify as a child of the marriage, because of a “somewhat depressed economy. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:10 pm
The jiplp weblog carries a pre-publication chance to read the Current Intelligence notes of Joel Smith and Joanna Silver (Herbert Smith LLP) on L'Oréal SA v eBay International and of fellow Kat Matt Fisher (UCL) on Albert Packaging v Nampak. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 In Corbyn v Millett [2021] EWCA Civ 657, the Court of Appeal provided useful commentary on the issue of ‘bare comment’. [read post]