Search for: "Waites v. State"
Results 5401 - 5420
of 12,159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
A 1994 California case, Jefferson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Ealing refused the referral, stating this authority is satisfied that the conditions of referral are met as the family have a local connection with us on grounds of residence. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
That court might wait for our en banc decision in McKinney. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
As stated I am also concerned for her emotional wellbeing. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
(Citing Wilson & Wilson v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:07 am
This column addressed the Ninth Circuit’s decision in the case Petrella v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 11:49 am
An unhappy party could file a state complaint wait for the results and then file a due process hearing over the same dispute. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:12 pm
In a case called State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:19 am
Regardless, the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:03 pm
Relying on precedent from Lamb v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:34 am
So the Tennessee Supreme Court is really interested in making sure the mandate of Gideon v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:54 am
A decade late, we are still waiting for the case law to answer that question. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:07 am
Such was the situation with Judge Hellerstein’s May 2, 2011, decision in Cortes v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 6:58 am
When the Ninth Circuit panel in January declared the new standard for sexual orientation claims, it found that such a standard was necessary from a between-the-lines reading of the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:39 pm
As Justice Brown stated in Bank of Montreal v Faibish, 2014 ONSC 2178, “Why should we be able to expect that treating courts like some kind of fossilized Jurassic Park will enable them to continue to provide a most needed service to the public in a way the public respects? [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
We will wait for you. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:45 am
Cox earlier on Monday said she couldn’t wait on the Supreme Court’s decision and would leave the state for care. [read post]
