Search for: "Williams v. Doe" Results 5401 - 5420 of 7,885
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:36 pm by Viking
One possibility would be to hold that the Confrontation Clause itself does not apply to most sentencing proceedings (i.e., that it does not apply beyond the scope of Apprendi), but that, not withstanding Williams v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 9:08 pm by Richard D. Friedman
One possibility would be to hold that the Confrontation Clause itself does not apply to most sentencing proceedings (i.e., that it does not apply beyond the scope of Apprendi), but that, notwithstanding Williams v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
“The mere presence of [other safety devices] somewhere at the work site” does not satisfy defendant’s duty to provide appropriate safety devices (Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513, 524, rearg denied 65 NY2d 1054; see Williams v City of Niagara Falls, 43 AD3d 1426; Whiting v Dave Hennig, Inc., 28 AD3d 1105, 1106). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
    This investigation previously led to the October 2008 indictments of Testwell Laboratories and its top executives, V. [read post]