Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Does this make it worth suing the card issuer? [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 7:58 am
It was open until five minutes after the commencement of the trial. [20] Discoveries of Mr. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 1:40 pm
Also, on 20 May 1998, the defendant appeared with counsel. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 8:48 am
At trial, the defendant agreed to stipulate that: (1) the collision was Mondragon's fault; (2) the fair market value of the car at the time of the collision was $3,400; (3) the cost of repairing the car was $2,752.70; (4) the daily rental value for a replacement car was $20; and (5) any exemplary damages awarded Austin would not exceed $5,000. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
She asserted that "Petitioner does not have a claim for wrongful retention at this time because, pursuant to the parties' agreed upon Stipulation, Ms. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 10:41 pm
Again, it is clear that the aim of § 285 is to compensate a defendant for attorneys’ fees it should not have been forced to incur. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:01 am
20. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:11 pm
I do, however, have 5 things I’d add now that my first year as a lawyer recently wrapped up: 1. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:15 pm
Under the Proposed Regulations, EAPs would be considered excepted benefits if the program is free to employees and does not provide significant benefits in the nature of medical care or treatment. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
If the entity continues unchanged but its former owners and managers are replaced, to whom does the attorney-client privilege run? [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:17 pm
The People opposed the application upon the ground that Correction Law § 168-d does not require a report to be prepared by the Board of Examiners since the defendant was to be sentenced by the Court to probation. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
It is also a fundamental tenet that copyright does not protect all copying from a work. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The request was granted but on appeal the Board decided this way of proceeding was wrong: a request under R 20(1) EPC 1973 (now R 22(1)) must be based on evidence of a transfer document, and such evidence was missing. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:32 am
Dec. 20, 2013). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
At the decertification stage, the court considers: “(1) whether the plaintiffs share similar or disparate factual and employment settings; (2) whether the various affirmative defenses available to the defendant would have to be individually applied to each plaintiff; and (3) fairness and procedural concerns. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 6:09 am
When reviewing a trial court's grant of remittitur, Tennessee appellate courts will conduct a three-step review consisting of (1) the trial court's reasons for granting a remittitur; (2) the amount of the reduction to ensure it does not destroy the jury's verdict; (3) the evidence related to damages to assess whether the proof is consistent with the remittitur. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:48 pm
Plaintiffs had requested a fine “in the nature of $20 million. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:41 pm
The district court judge who conducted the trial and who found the defendant guilty -- the judge who does not get reversed -- is Judge Snow. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
Colville 20 N.Y.3d 20. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
Miller, 44 S.W.3d 1, 11-12 (Tenn. [read post]
