Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 5421 - 5440 of 8,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 10:59 am by Thomas Heintzman
  One limit to the competence-competence principle has recently been explored by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Shaw Satellite G.P. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:01 pm
The Tennessee Court of Appeals (at Nashville) recently established the burden of proof to modify these orders in Lovelace v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:43 am by Richard Renner
There, the Court held that nuclear whistleblowers were not protected when they raised safety concerns to their superiors. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:24 am by Marc-Andre Russell
The decision was overturned by the Superior Court on judicial review in 2009. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
As Ted reported here recently, the Lago Agrio plaintiffs have commenced an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to enforce the Ecuador judgment against Chevron Corporation and its Canadian subsidiaries. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:14 am by Orin Kerr
Superior Court, handed down yesterday by the California Court of Appeal, Third District. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:06 pm by jason
The superior court reversed and the Court of Appeals certified three questions to the Supreme Court 1. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:04 pm by F. Gale Connor
The opening skirmish in the next phase of the battle between cities and the state over control of property taxes played out in Sacramento Superior court yesterday afternoon. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:32 am by Ilya Somin
I was merely pessimistic about the prospects of winning in court because I thought it would run counter to the Court’s earlier decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 944 (2005), the California Supreme Court held under the Constitution the legislature must prescribe the methods of waiving a jury trial and  that Section 631 does not authorize pre-dispute waiver of that right. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
More particularly, is the protection of children a superior value which the courts must strive to preserve even at the expense of transparency? [read post]