Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 5421 - 5440 of 15,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2018, 12:35 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
An Accounting and Court approval under Rule 4:87-1 would take many months. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 5:52 am by Samuel Cohen
THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN VENEZUELA The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is a federal republic comprised of 23 states, 2 federal territories, 1 capital district and 11 groups of islands (so called, federal dependencies). [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
Court of Appeal On the 23 November 2017, the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Sales, Flaux LJJ) dismissed Privacy International’s appeal against the Divisional Court’s Order on the preliminary issue. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 7:17 am by John Jascob
Previously, a Nebraska issuer could claim the statutory exemption at Section 8-1111(23) for a nonpublic offering made exclusively to Nebraska residents, provided: (1) the issuer’s total sale proceeds in any two-year period does not exceed $250,000 [now $750,000], and at least 80 percent of those proceeds are used in Nebraska; (2) no commissions or other remuneration are paid directly or indirectly to any person for soliciting prospective purchasers, except if paid to… [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 6:50 am by skelly
” Offering Goods or Services Criteria for determining when an entity is “offering goods or services” are addressed in GDPR Recital 23. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 6:32 am by Shanelle Van
Third, Fihn contends that, while the TPNW does not raise the safeguards requirements, “this treaty does not lower the standard of safeguards from the NPT. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
| Friday FantasiesNever Too Late 201 [Weeks ending 23 and 30 Sep] UK copyright in a no-deal Brexit scenario: what will happen? [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
Turning now to whether the Examining Division dealing with the Divisional application considered the minutes in case T 1712/15 as being a decision: the wording in Form 1703 does not support this. [read post]
The first three give interpretive analysis on Articles 3(1), 3(2) and 3(3) of the GDPR, respectively. [read post]