Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 27,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 2:22 am
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court applied the "primary purpose test" articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:06 am
The judge stated, “The prejudicial nature of this testimony accusing MGA of racist cultural appropriation cannot be understated. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:00 pm
In Schumacher v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 12:20 pm
Rivet, et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 12:20 pm
Rivet, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am
Even the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, masters of their domain when it comes to keeping drug dealers convicted and imprisoned, will jump as high as need be to appease the grocery clerk.Consider what happened in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm
Ames v The Spamhaus Project Ltd [2015] EWHC 127, at [109]). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
In a criticism (alleged fair use) case, the Panel found that the Complainant had common law protection, Joseph Schlessinger, Ph.D. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
Next week, the court will consider whether the Fair Housing Act prohibits policies that have a discriminatory effect, regardless of whether they were adopted with the intent to discriminate, in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. the Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:07 am
The tribunal found that Romania had breached the terms of the BIT by failing to ensure fair and equitable treatment, respect the claimants’ legitimate expectations and act transparently. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:38 am
Last week the court accomplished just that in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
That has some relevance to the goings on in our fair city. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:11 pm
Indeed, as Greenberger states, "Congress must do all it can to ensure that this decision does not stand, including by passing the Paycheck Fairness Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
"Explaining that due process and fundamental fairness require that a qualification or requirement for employment must be expressly stated in order for an employer to bypass the protections afforded by the Civil Service Law or a collective bargaining agreement and summarily terminate an employee, the Appellate Division said that in this instance the requirement of a commercial driver's license is not "expressly stated. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
"Explaining that due process and fundamental fairness require that a qualification or requirement for employment must be expressly stated in order for an employer to bypass the protections afforded by the Civil Service Law or a collective bargaining agreement and summarily terminate an employee, the Appellate Division said that in this instance the requirement of a commercial driver's license is not "expressly stated. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:56 pm
Thirty years later, however, on June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Miller v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
The Sixth Circuit agreed this week to publish United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
The seminal case in this area is Glatt v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
"Explaining that due process and fundamental fairness require that a qualification or requirement for employment must be expressly stated in order for an employer to bypass the protections afforded by the Civil Service Law or a collective bargaining agreement and summarily terminate an employee, the Appellate Division said that in this instance the requirement of a commercial driver's license is not "expressly stated. [read post]
