Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 37,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2007, 11:49 pm
In Air Couriers International v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:05 am
.; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Audi of America, Inc.; Ford Motor Company; Cummins Inc.; and Chrysler Group LLC. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
Andrée Sophia Blumstein is the solicitor general of Tennessee, which joined an amicus brief with 19 other states in support of the challenger in Janus v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:45 am
GEA Group AG v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Gameologist Group, LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:15 am
In Tandon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
July 28, 2023). 2Rod & Reel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
Forthcoming Appeals A number of data protection cases will be the subject of appeal hearings in 2018: TLT v Secretary of State for the Home Department – hearing 11 or 12 April 2018 Stunt v Associated Newspapers – hearing on 19 or 20 June 2018. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Compare Institutional Investors Group v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:07 am
Muneer Awad is the plaintiff who filed the lawsuit against the State of Oklahoma in Awad v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
The result in this case can be contrasted with State v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:05 pm
The case, Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:11 pm
The case is entitled Bramble v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:39 am
A recent case decided by the Supreme Court of South Carolina, Harleysville Group Insurance v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
In the case of Lanktree, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
In Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:37 am
In Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 11:24 pm
In a recent case handed down by the California Supreme Court entitled North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 6:41 pm
In Barnick v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
This could discourage sympathetic groups from lending support to the U.S. military, knowing it would preclude them from seeking refuge in the U.S. in the future.The majority contends that such concerns are overblown, pointing to a provision in the statute allowing the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, in consultation with each other and the Attorney General, to waive the terrorism bar. [read post]
