Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 6,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
A case decided two days ago by England's second highest court, the Court of Appeal, has highlighted the impact of the global financial crisis on family law property settlements, and the basis of setting them aside.In Myerson v Myerson, the husband was and is a fund manager in London. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:10 am
He said he's only found one case nationwide, a 1999 New Jersey Appellate Division decision, Pacelli v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 6:40 pm
Therefore, there was no error in the trial court's denial of husband's application to terminate child support for daughter. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The effect of this, according to the husband's counsel, was that if the settlement was implemented, the husband's assets would be minus £539,000 and the wife's plus nearly £11 million. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:18 pm
In Lumb v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:09 pm
Mickman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 5:13 am
The husband agreed to waive his right to alimony from the wife, in exchange for her waiver of child support from him. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:15 am
The court would have none of the husband's argument: "We do not agree that Section 3.104 authorized him to act without [the wife's] consent. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:16 pm
V. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:26 am
Account in Wife's Name Really Doesn't Escape ForfeitureIn another decision addressing the forfeiture of property in the spouse's name, United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
Austin, 968 S.W.2d 319 (Tex. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1067 (1999), where the husband moved to Texas to file for divorce while the wife remained in California. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
The ultimate decision in the Rossin cases is that the benefits paid to wife during the marriage were her separate property (rather than community property, thus precluding husband's sharing in the benefits). [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 9:41 am
A decision announced by the Idaho Supreme Court on March 5, 2009, Cramer v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:44 pm
The two children were given as tax exemptions to the husband but resided primarily with the wife. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:28 pm
Citizen husband and ineligle alien wife simply won’t take risks. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
Peterson or Romsa & Kuker, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Facts/Discussion: Wife sought review of the district court's divorce decree which ended her marriage to Husband. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
Under those circumstances, in Dowd v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:33 am
Do you really know whether your brother’s wife is legal? [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:41 am
The husband in Rick v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:31 pm
What happens if on a marriage breakdown the husband promises his former wife that if he dies before her, she will receive his pension benefits, but on his death the pension plan requires that the benefits be paid to his second wife? [read post]
