Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 5421 - 5440 of 7,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2009, 6:54 am
Here’s my response: 19 – you’re right: in Formal Opinion 2006-3, the NYC Bar did say that it’s ok to outsource legal work to other countries. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
TM is concerned with one kind of generalization: source information—who is responsible b/c of the presence of mark. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 7:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
In re BRCA1- & BRCA2-Based Hereditary Cancer Test Patent Litig., 774 F.3d 755, 764 (Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
Those powers are in s.51, Senior Courts Act 1981: 51. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, “[w]e have extensive procedures and controls that are designed to identify and address conflicts of interest,” and “[o]ur clients’ interests always come first. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
What makes Section 17(b) such a powerful statutory weapon 17(b) is that Section 17(b) is a  strict liability statute. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 8:10 am by Russell Knight
Evid. 201(e) An objection to judicial notice will be heard after judicial notice is taken. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:54 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
You’re the only one who can find the perfect tax preparer for your taxes: there’s no one size fits all in this business. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm by Orin Kerr
Warshak had the contents of his private e-mail accounts obtained from his ISP without a warrant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(b). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Given all this, it’s unsurprising that courts and the © Office have generally declined to take up the statute’s invitation to discover new categories. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:12 pm
" In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351, 1360 (Fed. [read post]