Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 12,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Justice Willett’s opinion explains why he did not join the opinion in full. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:18 am
Chief Justice Roberts asked about an accountant who completes a complicated return. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Justice Stevens has not expressed strong opinions. [read post]
28 May 2021, 4:00 am
Trump Justice Dept. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
The vote was 4-2, with Chief Justice Castille and Justice Eakin dissenting.So what happened? [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
Note that the case was primarily litigated about the constitutionality of section 5; the final opinion, however, focuses on section 4 and emphasizes that it leaves section 5 still standing. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
Fuglie (opinion by Chief Justice Jon Jensen): Jim Arthaud appeals a district court judgment granting Jim Fuglie's motion to dismiss. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:06 am
Given precedent, I understand the reason to come out the way Justice Perluss does. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:01 pm
"You look at all the good lacrosse schools and you see they're also very good schools. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:39 pm
Those realities include the greater frequency of divorces, re-marriages and ‘serial’ relationships. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Anderson is already beginning, before the Supreme Court’s opinion is released, because the tea leaves are clear already. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
I'm somewhat leaning towards Justice Tangeman's dissent in this one.Even before reading the dissent (and even before knowing there was one), I was a bit uncomfortable about the reasoning of Justice Yegan's opinion. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm
In Part III-C of Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion, which is a part of the opinion of the Court joined by the four liberal justices, Roberts writes: “The Court today holds that our Constitution protects us from federal regulation under the Commerce Clause so long as we abstain from the regulated activity. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
’” “Now we’re getting down deep . . . [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 4:57 pm
Joining in the majority were Presiding Justice Carol Hunstein, Justice Robert Benham and Justice Hugh Thompson.Justice George Carley, writing for the dissent, points out that the Georgia legislature "specifically addressed the issue of retroactive application" with a "clear and unambiguous provision," stating that the amendment was not to be applied retroactively. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:55 pm
So we're back to calling the Judge a Witch. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
And if you’re wondering, no, the study authors did not remove citations from the briefs. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 8:48 pm
The difference is that the justices don't have to scream, except when they're writing a minority opinion. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:42 pm
Three initially agreed in an opinion by Justice Raymond J. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:03 am
(Opinion at 8-10). [read post]
