Search for: "In v. United States" Results 5421 - 5440 of 102,939
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court narrowly interprets ban on “encouraging or inducing” immigrants to remain unlawfully in the United States
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm by Amanda Shanor
ShareOn Friday the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
#126:  The Federal False Claims Act
26 Jun 2023, 4:36 pm
  In United States ex rel. [read post]
NH Construction Law - https://www.nhconstructionlaw.com/blog
Guest Post: Is QT making D&O Policies a Liquid Asset? 
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
* [i] There have been more than 230 corporate bankruptcy filings in the United States in 2023, according to the latest market intelligence data from S&P Global. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Guest Post: Is QT making D&O Policies a Liquid Asset? 
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
* [i] There have been more than 230 corporate bankruptcy filings in the United States in 2023, according to the latest market intelligence data from S&P Global. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Witness Corroboration under the Texas Penal Code: Who Believes a Snitch?
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am by Michael Lowe
  As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog - http://www.dallasjustice.com/dallascriminallawyerblog
The Second Circuit holds that, despite the erroneous jury instructions defining the “crime of violence” required for a § 924(c) conviction — allowing the jury to convict the Petitioners based on predicate offenses that didn’t necessarily require the actual or threatened use of force — the Petitioners failed to show that the instructional errors “resulted in prejudice that would entitle them to the relief they [sought] under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” Nardino Colotti, et al. v. United States, Nos. 21-932(L), 21-937(CON), 21-950(CON), 21-992(CON), 21-1548(CON), __ F.4th ____ (2d Cir. June 21, 2023) (C.J.J.’s Leval, Parker, Menashi).
26 Jun 2023, 11:37 am by Darrell Fields
United States, Nos. 21-932(L), 21-937(CON), 21-950(CON), 21-992(CON), 21-1548(CON), __ F.4th ____ (2d Cir. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
[Josh Blackman] What Does U.S. v. Texas Tell Us About The DACA Litigation?
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Kavanaugh's decision in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Justices take up cases on veterans’ education benefits and 16th Amendment
26 Jun 2023, 9:06 am by Amy Howe
  In Moore v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
The Confrontation Clause was not violated by the admission of a nontestifying codefendant’s confession that did not directly inculpate the defendant and was subject to a proper limiting instruction.
26 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
 In Samia v. [read post]
Third Circuit Blog - http://circuit3.blogspot.com/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Supreme Court to Consider Scope of Congress's Taxing Power under the 16th Amendment
26 Jun 2023, 8:04 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Moore v United States, which considers the estent to which the 16th Amendment constrains Congress's ability to impose different sorts of taxes and, in particular, whether Congress may tax unrealized income without apportionment. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
FBI Thanks the Honesty of Whistleblowers in Catching Medicare Fraud
26 Jun 2023, 7:50 am by Max Kohn
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
Whistleblower Protection Blog - http://www.whistleblowersblog.org/
Blog Post: How Might U.S. v. Texas Affect DACA?
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
United States v. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
Reasonable statements made in the course of defending a claim of unlawful discrimination do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Reasonable statements made in the course of defending a claim of unlawful discrimination do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Frequent Pro Se Plaintiff Suing Court Document Archive PlainSite Over Publication of Court Records
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See also United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Samuel Alito Channels His Inner Donald Trump and Shows Himself to Be the ‘Trumpiest’ Supreme Court Justice
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am by Austin Sarat
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Latest Chapter in State Lawsuits Versus the Federal Government: United States v. Texas
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
The United States v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
[Jonathan H. Adler] What's Left Standing of Special Solicitude for States After U.S. v. Texas?
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Jonathan H. Adler
On Friday, in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
First patent revocation actions before the UPC have been filed
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by Benjamin Goh
The UPC is a new patents court which came into force on 1 June 2023, made up of judges who are nationals of EU Member states that are participating in the UPC. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
This Week in the Supreme Court – w/c 19th June 2023
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/