Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 55,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 4:49 am
Google asserted that PersonalWeb anticipated litigation no later than June 2011, before it even acquired the patents-in-suit because there were discussions regarding future litigation against major technology companies during weekly lunch meetings. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm
The majority says "No. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:21 pm
The majority holds that when you enter a home, find a 76-year old woman baking cookies, and beat her to death with a tree limb, that counts as a "carjacking" as long as -- once she's dead -- you walk out of the kitchen, across a breezeway, enter a garage, and take the dead woman's car.Justices Werdegar and Liu don't agree. [read post]
27 May 2016, 11:23 am
Judge Kozinski write the majority opinion and dismisses the habeas petition. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 5:01 pm
I'll simply add that I'm fairly confident that the vast majority of the people who voted for Prop. 36 intended that prisoners like Mr. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:32 am
Justice Liu writes the majority opinion. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:08 pm
And a split between the majority and the dissent.See which of these two opinions you find more persuasive. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
It's not that I don't appreciate Judge O'Scannlain's 77-page majority opinion. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 11:29 am
" And then drops a citation and quote to make clear that everything else that the majority said was dicta.Two competing visions. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:56 am
The majority says that, as a matter of law, that's not excessive force.Read it and see if you agree. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Matar v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:41 am
At issue in the case of Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:57 am
Witnesses' Written Remarks: The Honorable Mark V. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Similarly, in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
S. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:15 pm
HTI IP v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:29 am
In 2010, the South Carolina Supreme Court decision in Webb v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Therefore the central issue in both the cases under appeal was the interpretation and application of the statutory incompatibility ground of decision identified in the majority judgment in the Supreme Court in R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:39 am
A couple of decisions, though nothing major, from the banks of the Potomac: in 14 Penn Plaza v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
