Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 5421 - 5440 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The documents included two Extremism Analysis Unit Home Office reports and a Counter Terrorism Policing report. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
(IP Osgoode) General – Copyright Copyright 2.0 show – Episode 186 includes Universal v Lenz update, Marvel comic win against Stan Lee (PlagiarismToday) Australia Australia confirms ISPs are not copyright cops: Roadshow Films v iiNet (Ars Technica) (ipwars) (Excess Copyright) (IP Whiteboard) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) Lander J upholds Registrar’s decision to allow DIGITEK: Hills Industries Limited v Bitek Pty Ltd (ipwars) (ipwars) Canada… [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:41 pm by Kelly
File for harassment (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit holds-line on patent misuse defense: Princo Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:41 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, 328 U.S. 582, 597 (1946) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by Nabiha Syed
  In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough examines United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
  Similarly, the United States Congress is elected by American voters. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
In Reilly, another judge relied on Epic, and one of the very best litigators in the entire United States--Mark Perry--squared off with a "no name" attorney. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am by Joshua Thompson and Ralph Kasarda
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]