Search for: "People v. To" Results 5421 - 5440 of 73,008
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 5:27 am
On June 30, 2009 the Court of Appeals approved  its April 2009 opinion in  People v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:54 am by Jason Byrne
The Court of Appeals added another decision to the long litany of cases addressing the search of a vehicle incident to arrest by publishing its January 2012 decision in People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:27 am
Thanks to this post at Crime & Consequences, I see that earlier this week the California Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
Under this model, if representative bodies did a good job of representing the people, the courts would be unnecessary. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:24 am
"San Francisco, which spent over $672 million during the last fiscal year to provide shelter and housing to people experiencing homelessness, told the justices in a 'friend of the court' brief that its inability to enforce its own laws 'has made it more difficult to provide services' to those people.... [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
Yesterday the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Ice TV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd, bringing to an end legal proceedings that have been going on for the past three years. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:10 am by Robert George
Wade, though widely misunderstood, was popular with the American people and that Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:22 am by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Smith(2/16/12]) the Court of Appeals reversed a conviction for driving while impaired upon a holding that the trial court erred in permitting the People to introduce evidence that Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:40 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
So these people who want to talk about, you know, release him, he hasn’t said we should release him and we haven’t come to the end yet. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
" Appellant's Brief in People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:53 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" Because the computer screen printout was the only evidence establishing the identity of the purported true account owner upon which the check was drawn, we conclude that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
Supreme Court's decision in Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 [1963] requires the People to turn over evidence which is material either to the defendant's guilt or to punishment. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am by Eric Goldman
The fact that it’s even close here reflects the perniciousness of the hiQ v. [read post]