Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
CIR Tax Court, Internal Revenue Service 08a0328p.06 2008/08/29 Sonia Tucker v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
" Nat'l Sanitary Supply Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 9:44 pm
Public Service Elc. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
Co. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:54 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:10 pm
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, ET AL., No. 08-0187 BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Michael Clemmer, a consumer of ATM services, argues that the notice must explicitly state that a consumer "is" or "will be" (or some variant thereof) charged a fee. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 6:00 pm
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (2): Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of T.K. and J.S. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:59 am
We're talking about the law here.)Just last week, we clued you in to our longstanding interest in whether the last defendant served with a complaint has thirty days from service on it to remove, or whether the removal clock runs from the date of service on the first-served defendant.Then we saw City of Cleveland v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
According to Kwiatkowski, he was in the office speaking with a co-worker when Wonder suddenly interrupted him, stating "I can't believe you. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
For publication opinions today (7): In Ronald J. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:01 pm
For publication opinions today (2): In Cemantha Sidell Wolljung v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
For publication opinions today (3): In Star Transport, Inc. and Jeffrey Cottingham v. [read post]
