Search for: "State v. Cash "
Results 5421 - 5440
of 5,700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2008, 3:09 pm
When some of the non-Fee Committee attorneys objected, the district court held a hearing at which the court stated it had considered all twelve of the factors from Johnson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:00 pm
S. 265, 285-297 (1995) (THOMAS, J., dissenting); see also Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed restrictions… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:03 am
As we reported (again) yesterday, the editorial page at WSJ has a hootin' good time taking whacks at contingent fee lawyers who provide campaign cash to state attorneys general who retain them. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
" [34] Many observers forecast worry that the package will result in a "W" shaped, or double-dip, recession, where the aggregate demand will improve only temporarily and then decrease again. [35] V. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:08 am
See Swann v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
No clothes, just cash -- but name, after all, is destiny. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:02 am
Rick Kittel and KU Defender Project student Amy Hall won in State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:36 am
In this Case Egnotovich v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
Supreme Court decided Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
While Preston's appeal was pending, this Court held, in Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 12:35 am
The firm faces similar allegations of unauthorized subprime investments in a Dallas, Texas state court case entitled MetroPCS Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
In a 122 page opus on ERISA law (download here), District Court Judge Mark Kravitz has issued a fascinating and thorough decision, Amara v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:23 am
As for the women "winning" these arbitration proceedings, you seem to think that winning is equivalent to getting a cash award. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 5:32 am
Connecticut and Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 4:35 pm
Specifically, in Solis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 8:46 am
-V- GORALCZYK, TOM) issued by Chief Judge Baker, Judges May and Robb, and Sr. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:32 am
In Mills v. [read post]
