Search for: "State v. Governor"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 7,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
In McKenna v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:25 pm
Presently 25 states make it unlawful to text message while driving, with Wisconsin’s law just signed by the governor. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:56 am
In Chindarah v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
In McKenna v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:26 am
Ryan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 2:49 pm
My favorite case on the subject, which I included in my Sexuality casebook, is the aptly named State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 9:12 am
Hodges decision which struck down state-level bans against same-sex marriage. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 8:06 pm
Surrogate Nahman reasoned that “the validity of same-sex marriages has not been definitively determined by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department (see Funderburke v New York State Dep’t. of Civ. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:54 pm
Supreme Court, in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 7:51 am
In Train v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:12 pm
Policy, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 5:23 am
Rarely, by which I mean I can’t recall it ever happening before, has anyone been outraged at the New York State Board of Parole for releasing a prisoner. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:11 pm
” In response to similar questions from Justice Cuellar about whether the Court should “jettison” Moss v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
11 May 2021, 9:47 am
Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:35 am
The November argument was in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:22 am
Crowley was referring to the salaries of Michael V. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In his book, The Run of His Life, The People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
