Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 5421 - 5440 of 8,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
A smiling TV 2 Norway (new owner of C More) CEO possibly pictured before the CJEU rulingLast week this blog reported on the latest decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public within Article 3 of the InfoSoc Directive, this being C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg, C-279/13.BackgroundAs readers will remember, this was yet another reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly… [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am by Sandy Levinson
 (In Tennessee, the AG is appointed by the state Supreme Court.) [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
—————– Violators would forfeit their 180-day exclusivity period: Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)) is amended by inserting `section 29 of the Clayton Act or’ after `that the agreement has violated’. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Firstly, the local licence holder will lose revenue, and therefore motivation to buy a licence next time. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
While in the Voting Section, she received the high honor of being invited by the United States Solicitor General to sit at counsel table during the Supreme Court argument in Reno v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 11:03 pm by Scott Wolfe Jr
The pollution exclusion, which Judge Medley rejected based upon the Louisiana Supreme Court’s treatment of such clauses in cases like Doerr v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:11 am
"The Appeals Court ruling was based on an e-mail exchange between Basis and Amazon during mid-trial at the lower court (Basis Technology Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Zoe Tillman
The Supreme Court, ruling in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]