Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 173,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm
” An appended letter to Senator Wyden from Ronald Moultrie, the Under Secretary for Defense and Intelligence and Security in the Department of Defense (DOD), stated that Moultrie was: …not aware of any requirement in U.S. law or judicial opinion, including the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:08 pm
(See Donohue v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:30 pm
” Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:52 pm
Plaintiffs sued their bank alleging various claims under state law. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm
To do so they attempt to distinguish Miami Herald v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 11:42 am
The most famous example of this blatant abuse came to a head in Castellanos v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am
See Fox v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:37 am
Another huge relief for New York employers, the Second Department stated that the plain language of NYLL § 1981(1-a) and the law’s legislative history clearly support the conclusion that this statute addresses nonpayment and underpayment of wages, not the frequency of those payments. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:36 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:25 am
Chandler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:45 am
Diedrich v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:44 am
Plaintiff loses the case.The case is Goldberg v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
The 1982 LPCR asserted state control over cultural property by entrusting state, provincial, and municipal officials with the management of cultural property and designating looted artifacts as “stolen property,” but it had defects that compromised its efficacy.[18] By distributing the authority over cultural property to state and local governments, the law could cause confusion in its implementation, thus failing to punish looting. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
United States and Schenck v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:24 am
International Court of Justice Issues Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision Ohio v. [read post]
