Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 5421 - 5440 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  Moreover, it is also now clear that the state has a positive obligation to protect individuals from media intrusion into their private lives. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 3:15 pm
Via the IPKat's informative friend Stephanie Bodoni (Bloomberg) comes news of the European Court of Justice hearing today in Case C-343/07 Bavaria N.V. and Bavaria Italia Srl v Bayerischer Brauerbund e.V. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In recent years, many prominent originalists have attempted to demonstrate that the holding in Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am by Conor McEvily
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:07 am by Will Aitchison
” Buckhannon, 532 U.S. at 606 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:07 pm by The Complex Litigator
” In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th at 327 (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Clemens v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
” Thus, a trademark owner may only seek redress if another’s use of a registered mark on a different set of goods and services is likely to cause confusion with the owner’s use of the mark in connection with its registered goods.The Ninth Circuit reiterated its holding in Interstellar Starship Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim of conversion of money is proper “when funds designated for a particular purpose are used for an unauthorized purpose” (East Schodack Fire Co., Inc. v Milkewicz, 140 AD3d 1255, 1256 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]