Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 8,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2019, 8:20 pm
The Factum for the Urban Alliance on Race Relations states describes some of the contextual factors around the relationship with law enforcement in this neighbourhood, Carding was a practice ostensibly implemented as a public safety measure. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov’s exhaustive account of United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Several Election Deniers Backed by Trump Prevail in Hotly Contested Primaries MSN – Hannah Knowles (Washington Post) | Published: 8/3/2022 Several election deniers backed by former President Trump prevailed in closely watched primaries on August 2, as a nationwide battle over the future of the GOP played out in state and federal races across five states. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
United States, 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
--The Secretary of State shall make each report submitted under this subsection available to the public on the internet website of the Department of State. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm
So what did the state do? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Innovative Health Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:36 am
[vi]The NASAA report found that Ponzi scheme victims were often targeted through the internet or for identifiable attributes, such as race or religion. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Maia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:48 am
United States (docket 12-6142). [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:00 am
See Wilcox v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
July 25, 2024) ; Council of Life Insurers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Female Genital Mutilation Ban Exceeds Congress's Power, Holds District Court
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm
Policing such behavior, the court concludes, is a matter for the states, because it isn't authorized as a regulation of commerce or as necessary and proper to comply with treaties.The decision, handed down today, is U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
” Driverless vehicles are a certainty, and the race is on to get the rubber to the road. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
” Driverless vehicles are a certainty, and the race is on to get the rubber to the road. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am
“The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude,” read the amendment’s first section. [read post]
