Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 5421 - 5440 of 6,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2009, 4:12 pm
That's just how we roll on "Strong" Island. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 3:32 am
In part V of this series, we will set out the legal framework for service businesses in China. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:10 am by INFORRM
The rationale for such strict contempt laws is that they compensate for the fact that in Britain, unlike the United States, we have very limited jury vetting and so prejudicial material must be especially carefully controlled before and during the trial. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:47 am by Brian A. Hall
Following a trial in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Defendant prevailed. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Joe Whitworth
This is despite tomatoes being a known source of Salmonella outbreaks in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am by Andrew Delaney
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:46 pm
Most interesting is its reinforcement of the hub abd spoke working style: " it does not forget its original intention, keeps its mission firmly in mind, assumes all responsibility for the entire picture, coordinates all sides, and unites and leads the entire Party, the entire military, the entire country and the people of all ethnicities in the untiring struggle to comprehensively construct a strong, modern Socialist country, and realize the Chinese Dream of the great… [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
The presence of this . . . risk warns against use of special, strong pro-speech judicial presumptions or special regulation-skeptical of judicial review. [read post]