Search for: "TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATION"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 23,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
The post Court Upholds $6.6 Million Punitive Damages Award in Retaliation Suit appeared first on HRWatchdog by Gail Cecchettini Whaley. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:57 am
First, the courts are reluctant (and some would say Constitutionally unable) to mandate any substitute for a trial in state court, particularly anything the litigants must pay for in addition to statutory filing fees. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:02 pm
The Court approved the sum of $1.5 million for the class of 128 artists, as well as legal fees of $500,000. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:31 pm
The new IP courts should be trial as well as appeal courts. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
Post in The West Virginia Record by Steve Korris -Statehouse Bureau"MORGANTOWN - Caps on awards for pain and suffering in medical malpractice trials prevent runaway jury verdicts, the West Virginia State Medical Association pleads in a case the Supreme Court of Appeals will hear on Tuesday, March 8.The association, as friend of the court, urges the Justices to reject a constitutional challenge to limits the Legislature imposed on non economic damages… [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:53 am
Briefly: At Bloomberg Environment, Ellen Gilmer reports that”[c]onservation groups are calling on the Supreme Court to reject efforts by the Trump administration and Dominion Energy Inc. to build a natural gas pipeline across the Appalachian Trail,” in U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held Nov. 13 (Warney v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
Cir. 2015) At the conclusion of its Inter Partes Review Proceeding (IPR), the Administrative Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) concluded that several claims of Achates’ patents were invalid. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:03 am
Such endorsements would have avoided Supreme Court defeats and would have showed the world that many of the Bush administration policies are the considered judgments of the majority of the representatives of the American people. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 11:06 am
The fact that this information is so limited supports the idea that the Pre-Trial Chamber needs only to assess the factual basis for an investigation and to determine whether the court would have jurisdiction over it. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
It used a third-party administrator (TPA) to manage both FMLA and non-FMLA leave requests. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
It used a third-party administrator (TPA) to manage both FMLA and non-FMLA leave requests. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 5:04 am
House of Representatives during the Obama Administration, that Congress has not voted the money to cover the payments to insurers, Judge Chhabria is not bound by that ruling because it is by another trial court. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:14 am
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr.'s closing remarks in the high court this week were targeted to Kennedy. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 11:06 pm
Generally speaking trial proceedings in criminal matters should be heard in open court unless it is in the interest of: Good order; Public morals; Security of the state; or The administration of justice. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:18 pm
With the judge’s stay order, the controversy over the administration policy returned to where it was before May 19, with everything focused on the Supreme Court’s review. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
A separate, narrower lawsuit against the administration’s latest action, by an Arizona county sheriff, has been filed in a federal trial court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
“Pre-trial” and “trial” meant just what the statute said, spoke the Court in Lexecon, and trials must occur after MDL cases are remanded to their original transferor districts.Not that MDL courts haven’t tried to get around Lexecon. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 7:06 am
One must credit the conservative-controlled Court and not the Obama Administration for that change. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm
It reversed the trial court’s decision to overrule the plea in bar, holding that the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine deprived the court of jurisdiction to hear the claim. [read post]
