Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 5421 - 5440 of 8,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2013, 3:19 pm
They claim, however, that to require members of the police department who are assigned to the OCCB to undergo random drug testing without reasonable suspicion is a violation of their rights under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article 1, § 12 of the Constitution of the State of New York. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Perry and United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:59 pm by Mary Dwyer
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington12-651Issue: Whether, when the Mandatory Restitution for Sexual Exploitation of Children Statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:20 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  On May 17, the Solicitor General, having been invited to do so by the court, filed a brief expressing the views of the United States on whether the court should grant the petition for certiorari. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:25 am by John Lindsay
Be aware that the United States patent landscape has changed and so must your patent strategy. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:25 am by John Lindsay
Be aware that the United States patent landscape has changed and so must your patent strategy. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:34 am by Steve Schultze
CTIA—The Wireless Association was the name of the petitioner. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am by Miriam Seifter
 All agree, the Court says, that under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  Under AEDPA, federal courts no longer determine whether state courts correctly rejected a habeas petitioner’s federal claims; they only grant relief if the state courts applied federal law unreasonably—a deferential standard. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:00 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
KaplinskyLast week, the Solicitor General finally filed his brief expressing the views of the United States on whether the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2013, 8:46 am by David Oscar Markus
The Florida courts rejected Ferguson’s Panetticlaim, and we must decide whether their decision to do so “was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding” or was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Commissioner, the Court unanimously held that the United Kingdom’s “windfall tax” is creditable against a company’s U.S. income tax liability. [read post]