Search for: "Then v. INS" Results 5421 - 5440 of 10,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Levy, 247 P. 967 (Oklahoma Supreme Court 1026); Aetna Life Ins. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“On a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory” (Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, 971 [2016]; see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, for all the above stated reasons it is hereby ORDERED, that the motion of INES GASSMANN and the cross-motions of MICHAEL O'SULLIVAN, CHARLES PEKNIC, MARTIN A. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am by Marty Lederman
  The two December cases are Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm by Will Baude
S., at 305, it may at any time replace such judicial rules with legislation of its own, see Prudential Ins. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As a general rule, the existence of a valid and enforceable contract governing a particular subject matter precludes recovery in quasi-contract on a theory of unjust enrichment for events arising out of the same subject matter (see Goldman v Metropolitan Life Ins. [read post]