Search for: "W H " Results 5421 - 5440 of 5,769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 6:36 pm by carie
In a decision written by Chief Justice William H. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
(a) Section 271(b)'s text--"[w]hoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer"--is ambiguous as to the intent needed to impose liability. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Bernard Bell
  As I discussed, the rule creates an almost insurmountable hurdle.[5]  See, Bernard W. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Late last Friday evening, a policy brief written by 24 year old Derek Khanna was posted to the website for the Republican Study Committee (RSC), a caucus of conservative House Republicans. [read post]
12 May 2007, 10:03 pm
At that hour, Chief Circuit Judge Douglas H. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:31 am by Abacus IP
Its scientific name is "Bos sauveli" with a size: HB: 2100mm-2300mm; H: 1700mm-1900mm and W: 700-900 kg. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:06 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
By Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law Jeff Thurman of San Bernardino asked me this question on my Facebook page, and I told him on Facebook I would write about here at the blog: “Would be interested in your take on CA City Attorney Code of Ethics regarding Mr. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:33 am
In order to comply with  subscription agreements you will need to use your own Westlaw password to view the full text of cases listed below: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 ©       1. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:36 am by Kenneth Anderson
  In a pre-Durban paper entitled “W[h]ither the Kyoto Protocol,” I identified three scenarios: (1) business-as-usual, with modest progress in developing the Copenhagen/Cancun framework and no political breakthroughs; (2) agreement to a “political” (not legally-binding) second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol; and (3) agreement to a Kyoto Protocol amendment establishing a second commitment period, combined with a mandate for a new… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm by Jason Rantanen
  “[W]e have never before held—in the context of either § 271(f) or § 271(b)—that a party can induce itself to infringe. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
Previously arcane arguments over the constitutionality of the public debt limit now make headlines.[1]  At the same time, debate swirls around whether the President of the United States has the constitutional authority, resting on Section Four of the 14thamendment, to ignore the debt limit. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:34 pm by Sophia Tang
  Jurisdiction over consumer contracts: The proposal inserts protective jurisdiction rule for consumer contracts (Art. 280). paragraph 1 of this article provides “(w)hen the domicile of consumer is within the territory of China but the domicile of operator or its establishment is not”, which permits a Chinese consumer to sue foreign business in China. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:39 pm by Robert Liles
Texas Prosecutors are Aggressively Targeting Criminal Home Health Fraud (January 9, 2019):  Despite real progress being made with respect to regulatory compliance, home health agencies, their owners, and affiliated health care professionals (such as referring / supervising physicians, therapists and staff) remain under strict government scrutiny. [read post]