Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 5421 - 5440
of 66,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
s PR consultant had, incorrectly, stated that P2 did not know P1 this was an unauthorised statement which had been corrected within 3 days [19]. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:11 am
The State of New York and the State of Connecticut brought suit against Scott Pruitt, as Administrator of the EPA, as well as the agency itself seeking an order to set a deadline by which the EPA would need to fulfill its mandatory duties under the Clean Air Act to set Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs) for National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) when states fail to satisfy their obligations under the Good Neighbor Provision of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
North Carolina, as well as a pending partisan-gerrymandering case, League of Women Voters v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:42 am
On the other hand, it relies on a lot of well-worn First Amendment precedent. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:02 am
However, the issue of a passenger's right to challenge the scope of the ensuing investigation had not been specifically addressed until the recent New Mexico Court of Appeals case of State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:26 am
In Kim v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
The 2023 budget allocation to the Department as well as increased permit fees and penalties will help cover some of this cost. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 10:13 am
” In Pugh v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:48 am
These questions were highly contentious in the United States during the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
Bona Law also filed an amicus brief in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 pm
The precedent in the circuit, as well as analagous persuasive authority from various state supreme courts and the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:53 am
EPA found that Summit's natural gas sweetening plant and the associated production wells were one facility for purposes of Title V. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
Jones v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
" Kavanaugh praised Justice Scalia's Morrison dissent, as well as Justice Robert H. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 10:20 am
California law requires that the property interest be “well-defined” and “like staking a claim to a plot of land at the title office. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:44 pm
Before embarking on this exercise, it would do well to recap what the Supreme Court stated in BCCI v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
Sanders v. [read post]
