Search for: "Action Communications Inc" Results 5441 - 5460 of 10,899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 1:31 am by Jani
In his email communication to Straight Pride UK Mr. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
These employees are used to receiving real-time feedback and online communication. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 10:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Because the board reviewed the appropriate statutory factors in making its determination, and rendered its determination after considering the appropriate factors and properly weighing the benefit to petitioners against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community if the variances were granted, the action taken by the Board was not illegal, arbitrary, or an abuse of discretion. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by WIMS
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:07 am by Laura McAleer
Laura McAleer In the largest ever data security enforcement action taken by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), AT&T agreed to pay $25 million to resolve an investigation into consumer privacy violations at its call centers in Mexico, Colombia, and the Philippines. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
 Uppercase is Senate action; lowercase is House action. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by Attorney Aaron Konopasky
If there is no way to accommodate, consider your options and take the appropriate action. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Bard, Inc., 2015 WL 502010, at *4 (S.D.W. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm
As I argue in this article, the great bulk of the precedent says “everyone who uses mass communications technology,” whether or not they are members of some group called the “media;” see also Obsidian Finance Group LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Following a derivative action and several defaults, Alcede caused the company to file a Chapter 11 petition. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:00 pm by Robert Varian
  The action is significant because the SEC was targeting seemingly innocuous language in a confidentiality agreement and there were no allegations that the company, KBR, Inc., was otherwise breaking the law. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
<> USDA Awards Grants to Address Water Quality, Availablity in Agriculture Communities - WASHINGTON, April 7, 2015 – The U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008)), we were inclined to pass it by, since preemption under the Federal Communications Act is not exactly something that arises in our sandbox very often. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
Rule 21F-17 provides in part, as follows: “(a) No person may take any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission staff about a possible securities law violation, including enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement…with respect to such communications. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:54 am by WIMS
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
” Katz, Marshall & Banks took action in the wake of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement action against technology and engineering firm KBR Inc. for violating whistleblower-protection regulations by forcing its employees to sign restrictive confidentiality agreements. [read post]