Search for: "All Other Claimants" Results 5441 - 5460 of 13,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
   In order to succeed in receiving a waiver of part are all of an overpayment, it is necessary to show, first, that the overpayment was not caused by the claimant. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
However, they dismissed the appeals of the remaining claimants in MA and upheld the Secretary of State’s cross-appeal in A – the former relating to other individuals with disabilities, and the latter to domestic violence victims protected under Government-administered “Sanctuary Schemes”. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
All in all, this board seems like it will be a cheaper, faster and easier way to handle copyright infringements. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 2:17 am
 In the IPEC, simpler claims can be decided without a hearing at all. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
  On the menu was "Obviousness over the common general knowledge", followed by mulled wine and mince pies, all served up by chair Michael Hicks, the man behind the successful obviousness over CGK challenge way back when in Pozzoli SpA v BDMO SA & Others [2006] EWHC 1398 (Pat) (first instance) and [2007] EWCA Civ 588 (Court of Appeal). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Eleonora Rosati
This argument did not persuade the judges, since the CJEU decision did provide the necessary balance of all the affected fundamental rights. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
I do not see him playing any part at all in this eviction so as to entitle the claimant to damages against him, but I bear in mind that this is a claim that has been brought by the claimant. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:44 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The Court of Appeal held that to establish discrimination, in the context of child care, a claimant must prove the following. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:39 am
 CPR Part 63 r63.9 relates to disclosure in patent cases and practice direction 63PD 6.1 is the provision which deals with product and process descriptions: "6.1 Standard disclosure does not require the disclosure of documents that relate to –(1) the infringement of a patent by a product or process where – (a) not less than 21 days before the date for service of a list of documents the defendant notifies the claimant and any other party of the defendant's… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:27 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
In fact, IIHS data reveals that approximately 66 percent of all claimants who filed bodily injury liability coverage in 2002 claimed neck injuries. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
Moreover, this interpretation is reinforced by clause 6(b), by which the Group Members promised not to transfer any interest in the copyrights to any other person, which I read in context as meaning any person other than the Claimant. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
“The Sewel Convention is merely a political restriction”. 12:39 Lord Keen QC refers to Lord Reid in the Imperial Tobacco and other cases where it was suggested that this is a convention an [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Moreover, this interpretation is reinforced by clause 6(b), by which the Group Members promised not to transfer any interest in the copyrights to any other person, which I read in context as meaning any person other than the Claimant. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 5:42 pm by Kevin LaCroix
With the substantial settlement that (some) of the claimants have reached in the RBS case, it may be that others may now seek to pursue collective investor actions in the U.K. [read post]