Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 5441 - 5460 of 9,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2012, 2:07 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Supreme Court struck down a Texas statute that effectively barred children from public elementary and secondary schools if they were in the United States unlawfully. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:20 am by Lyle Denniston
———— Arizona state officials asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to allow election officials there to demand that all voters show proof of citizenship before they may register to vote   The divided en banc Ninth Circuit Court ruled in April that the citizenship proof requirement conflicts with a 1993 federal law passed to make it easier for individuals to sign up to vote. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:11 am by Joe May
Supreme Court meets Thursday to consider Montana’s ban on corporate political spending” by Charles S. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Sung Un Kim
[JURIST] The state of Arizona on Wednesday filed an Application to Stay Mandate [text, PDF] asking the US Supreme Court [official website] to allow state election officials to demand voters to show proof of citizenship before registering to vote. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:19 am by Rick Hasen
SCOTUSBlog: “Arizona state officials asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to allow election officials there to demand that all voters show proof of citizenship before they may register to vote   The divided en banc Ninth Circuit Court ruled in April that the citizenship proof requirement conflicts with a 1993 federal law passed to make it easier for individuals to sign up to vote. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Bullock, the challenge to the Montana Supreme Court ruling upholding a statute that bans corporate spending in state elections, at its Conference today. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm by Todd Ruger
" On Monday, Senate Democrats had to force a vote to stop debate on the nomination of Hurwitz, an Arizona Supreme Court justice, who authored a law review article in 2002 that some Republicans said showed how he helped create and still admires the legal framework for the controversial Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by CJLF Staff
Arizona Execution Scheduled: The Associated Press reports the Arizona Supreme Court on Tuesday approved the execution of Daniel Wayne Cook, scheduled for August 8. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:30 am
Supreme Court this month on the law, which was signed by Gov. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:18 am by Joe May
Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to state legislative remap” by Dave McKinney in the Chicago Sun-Times. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:16 pm by Charles Miller
Between now and the end of the Supreme Court’s term on June 28th there will be a host of Supreme Court watchers that predict that the controversial Arizona immigration law SB 1070 will be upheld, representing a major defeat for the Obama administration and the Plenary Power Doctrine, which has existed since 1789 and the interpretation of Chief Justice John Marshall’s Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm by Mandelman
 The Arizona Supreme Court, in a decision on May 18, 2012, said NO. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm by Mandelman
 The Arizona Supreme Court, in a decision on May 18, 2012, said NO. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm by Todd Ruger
"As a member of the Arizona Supreme Court for nearly a decade, Justice Hurwitz has proved an able jurist," Kyl said in a written statement. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:44 pm by Todd Ruger
Supreme Court, Justice Potter Stewart jokingly referred to him “as the clerk who wrote the Newman opinion. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:16 am by nflatow
Hurwitz, currently an Arizona Supreme Court Justice, has strong support from both of his Republican home-state senators, Jon Kyl and John McCain. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:58 am by Irene
Hurwitz currently sits on the Arizona Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, and affirmed the decision of the Supreme Court of Indiana.The Supreme Court held that denying the refunds to the taxpayers who had paid in full created a classification that does not involve a fundamental right or suspect classification, does not discriminate against interstate commerce or new residents. [read post]