Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 29,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2021, 8:16 am
After a thorough review of the complex history of discovery, the court concluded that “[plaintiff’s] conduct clearly warrants sanctions. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:16 am
After a thorough review of the complex history of discovery, the court concluded that “[plaintiff’s] conduct clearly warrants sanctions. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:16 am
After a thorough review of the complex history of discovery, the court concluded that “[plaintiff’s] conduct clearly warrants sanctions. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:39 am
The series’ contributors include: Maggie Blackhawk, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Emily deLisle, University of Pennsylvania Law School; Katherine Florey, University of California, Davis School of Law; Dylan R. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
The case names of the newest decisions start with Section 3 and are denoted by bold italic fonts. 2020 CEQA UPDATE To read the 2020 cumulative CEQA review, click here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2021/01/articles/ceqa/2020-ceqa-4th-quarter-review/ CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There is 1 CEQA case pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 1:45 am
Supreme Court to review its appeals court loss against Qualcomm Inc, which the agency had accused of breaking antitrust law in selling chips for smartphones. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm
California, 141 S. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 2:06 pm
The specific mechanisms through which customers are able to exercise these rights are detailed and extensive, so thorough review of the CDPA’s specific mechanisms for compliance are recommended for businesses beginning compliance preparations. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 8:32 am
Joh and Thomas Wuil Joo (University of California, Davis - School of Law and University of California, Davis - School of Law) have posted an abstract of The Harms of Police Surveillance Technology Monopolies (Denver Law Review Forum,... [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 2:48 am
And it seems to violate the very California law that formed the basis of the DAs’ lawsuit against the company. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 9:18 am
Adam Isles and Paul Rosenzweig reviewed a traditional way of evaluating cybersecurity. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
In a Gonzaga University Law Review article, Croxall examines the beer industry in Washington and California, two states that have rigorous anticompetitive laws for alcoholic beverage companies. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:40 pm
The post How the American Rescue Plan Modifies the FFCRA and Impact On California Employers appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
California v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 8:10 am
What is the current state of the cybersecurity practice of law? [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 3:05 am
And if half the companies subject to the law don’t file, well, so much for the accuracy of the report. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm
“Free Speech is a Triangle” In this essay for the Columbia Law Review, Jack M. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 3:13 pm
Employers should consider reviewing and updating their employment policies to incorporate any applicable changes related to COVID-19. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 3:13 pm
Employers should consider reviewing and updating their employment policies to incorporate any applicable changes related to COVID-19. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 2:39 pm
The law firm’s two-page report summary can be found here. [read post]
