Search for: "Childs v. Childs"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 5:04 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Div. 2007) (”if a party agrees to support a child beyond that otherwise required, a court must favor the agreement, in the interests of the child”); Hallberg v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 7:20 am
In the case of McIntyre v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) D (A Child) [2012] EWCA Civ 627 (14 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Kudos Catering (UK) Ltd v Manchester Central Convention [2012] EWHC 1192 (QB) (19 April 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) The Procter & Gamble Company v Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA & Anor [2012] EWHC 1257 (Ch) (14 May 2012) Edenwest Ltd v CMS Cameron McKenna (A Firm) [2012] EWHC 1258 (Ch) (14 May 2012) Stupples v… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
L.D. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 7:47 am
Niko v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:03 am
On August 21, 2007, in Spires v Bergman, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided in an opinion for publication that where a parent has sole legal custody of the child at the time of the proceedings, the so-called â € œ100-Mile Ruleâ €  [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:01 pm
Consider the March 29, 2012 decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Hirsch v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 3:20 am
In Bowers -v- VanderMuellen-Bowers, the parents had joint legal custody of their son. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:29 pm
" Zabner v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 2:09 pm
You can read more about FBI v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 12:55 am
Denzik v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:07 am
The First District Court, in an opinion issued yesterday in Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:03 pm
Factors that Work Against Relocation In relocation disputes, as illustrated by Mackey v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:27 am
Henry v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:18 pm
Higerd v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:11 pm
In Chen v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 11:25 am
Blanchette, a COA case holding that face-to-face Confrontation can be dispensed with under certain circumstances involving child witnesses. [read post]
25 May 2014, 12:23 pm
As was held in Merl v Merl, Matter of Boden v Boden and Nelson v Nelson, generally, child support provisions deriving from such an agreement may be modified upon a showing that the agreement was not fair and equitable when entered into, or upon a showing of an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances. [read post]
