Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 13,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2025, 2:46 pm
Since the 2018 United States Supreme Court decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
The bottom line: the claim that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence did not “fail to state a cause of action” and was therefore it was incorrect for Supreme Court to dismiss Spry’s petition.NYPPL [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The working group also contains two lawyers from the Ministry of the Attorney General (Tamara Barclay & Sunil Manthai), along with one lawyer from the Office of the Chief Justice (Trevor Guy). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:20 pm
Notes for: --Marbury v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:34 am
For instance, this ILB entry from April 30th includes this comment:NOTE that this case was lost in the Clerk's office until last month. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm
The case is City of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:11 am
Last week, the Delaware District Court stayed the litigation proceedings in Enhanced Security Research, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am
” Briefly: For The Wall Street Journal, Gabriel Rubin reports that “[t]he Securities and Exchange Commission said it plans to rehear dozens of cases that were pending before its in-house administrative-law judges, following a June Supreme Court ruling[, in Lucia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Servs., 55 AD3d 614 Stephen Russell sued the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services following its terminating his temporary employment as a bridge and tunnel officer. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
It also would cap the Supreme Court at nine justices even though such a proposal fell squarely outside the convention’s mandate. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:22 am
”*** As a police officer, Castro was a "public officer. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
Such was the case in Gibson’s Bakery v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
Important to Axon’s “at-will removal” argument is the fact that in Lucia v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am
The other Court-related story making headlines is Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal’s “confession” that the Solicitor General’s Office made mistakes in defending Japanese internment before the Supreme Court during World War II. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
Robb, the 1st District notes that those days are over since the Supreme Court held in State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:47 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 29, 2011. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:30 am
Principal appealed the Supreme Court's decision.The Appellate Division, explaining that the "limited issue" it was whether the subpoena ad testificandum issued in the pending SED administrative decertification matter was properly quashed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
