Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
” Terry v Bayer Corp., 145 F.3d 28, 35-36 (1st Cir. 1998)(quoting Garren v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:10 pm
Idiotically formalistic though this might be, I viewed it as just deserts for the formalistic legal norm that income must be taxed only once, a norm under which being taxed ten times at a 1% rate each time would be a horrid injustice, whereas being taxed once at 35% would be unobjectionable.However, Fadi Shaheen, in a message that he has authorized me to quote (I don't otherwise spill the beans here on private communications), says the following:"1. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am
The reaction from copyright skeptics about the report’s conclusions that copyright contributes significantly to the US economy was, essentially: “Does not. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 3:35 pm
For the record, and for the many people who have discussed it without ever having read it, this is what it says: "13 Offence of unauthorised copying etc. of design in course of business After section 35 of the Registered Designs Act 1949 insert— “35ZA Offence of unauthorised copying etc. of design in course of business (1) A person commits an offence if— (a) in the course of a business, the person copies a registered design so as to make a… [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:48 am
Article 8 and public law defences were raised and the County Court recorder dismissed the Council’s claim in a written judgement on 10/1/13. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:48 am
Article 8 and public law defences were raised and the County Court recorder dismissed the Council’s claim in a written judgement on 10/1/13. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
(para. 33) The Committee states that it “does not consider itself entitled to concede any jurisdiction on the part of the Federal Court to interfere in the judicial conduct proceedings of an inquiry committee or the Council” (para. 35). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:32 pm
An interesting question is whether release of a low-risk, long-term inmate should be denied if the inmate does not accept responsibility for his offense. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:15 am
The Leahy bill does not include the technical fix to the Covered Business Method (CBM) provisions of the AIA, Section 18(a)(1)(C)(i). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
However, in the case at hand there appears to be one crucial difference to this argument and that is Art. 35 para. 1 Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
If the patented feature does not drive the demand for the product, sales would be lost even if the offending feature were absent from the accused product. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:58 am
Instead of 35%, those taxpayers will pay 39.6%. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 4:44 am
The examiner rejected the pending claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
For the last 35 years, California taxpayers have funded the state’s so-called “death penalty” to the tune of over $4 billion. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:06 am
Defendant has a 35% interest in a $1.3 million shopping center, and paid his attorneys a retainer of $3,500. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
There must have been an awful lot of evidence to read, because it wasn't until January 2010 that the Opposition Division dismissed the Article 8(1)(b) opposition since there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
That does not mean however, that, if a witness does not itself comply with a request directed to it, the party or representative is indulging in “procedural games”.[36] Therefore, the board decided to refuse the appellant-patentee’s request not to hear the witnesses. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:28 am
Almost 11% of the class, the same percentage as last year, does not use any social networking site . . . but those who are users . . . [read post]
