Search for: "English v. English" Results 5441 - 5460 of 11,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am by Alfred Brophy
Described in depth in Section V, it also emerges from the multi-disciplinary framework of social healing through justice Professor Yamamoto has been developing for guiding and assessing practical reconciliation initiatives. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
In a complaint to Ofcom made in 2012, TM had asserted that episodes of Big Fat Gypsy Weddings and Thelma’s Gypsy Girls were unfair, portraying Irish Traveller, English Traveller, Gypsy and Romany people (“ITG&R”) in a negative and racially stereotypical way. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:50 am by Alexandra Allan
Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd v Salgaocar Mining Industries Private Ltd (2015) (Unreported) After extensive negotiations, London brokers fixed a 10-year charterparty on behalf of their principals, the Charterers. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
All eyes are on next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, and I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
This article is completely distinct from the book.The second is The Gendered Origins of the Lumley Doctrine: Binding Men's Consciences and Women's Fidelity, which appeared in the Yale Law Journal 101 (1992): (1992):The English case Lumley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:13 am
Meanwhile, if you want to get a taste of Dutch jurisprudence on the subject of taste protection, here's a link to an English translation of the decision in Kecofa v Lancôme. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog, while I added our coverage in Plain English. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:23 am
 Tobias is also letting us have a copy of an English translation of Kecofa v Lancôme. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Newton (which stands for the proposition that hyperlinking does not constitute publication of the hyperlinked material), as well as the line of English cases considering ISP liability (Godfrey v. [read post]