Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 5,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2008, 7:08 am
Let's face it, we'd much rather get the stuff we want rather than those ugly sweaters and hideous candlestick holders. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:56 am
That, he says, is why battles over SPCs, though not common, are so keenly fought. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 12:00 am
The new test, set forth in Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:35 pm
Sealed Air Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
* Dozier Internet Law v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:16 pm
I'm no Talmudic scholar, but I'd imagine the original copyright holder is He who is called I Am. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:54 am
Under State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
In fact, he pointed out that Arizona, the location where the complainant had agreed to accept court jurisdiction in the event that these was an objection to the UDRP decision, is part of the Ninth Circuit, which had a controlling case on point, Bosley Medical v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
Davis (2001) and Clark v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:29 pm
Going back to precedent, if fair use grew out of Folsom v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:28 am
Had he been on the court, I suspect there would be a lot of changes that I don’t like and the American people wouldn’t like, including everything from Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:50 pm
Ringside at Lessig Copyright Bout Kahle v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Boyden's initial question about contract law being used as an expanding wedge for rights holders. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:22 am
Arguably the most important decision from a technology perspective—and the case that was of most interest to me personally—was LG v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:53 pm
In April, Judge Neil V. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:06 pm
[t]he owner or holder of the lien fails to file an action to foreclose the lien in the county where the property is located not later than thirty (30) days after receiving the notice. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Respondents relied on Rust v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
See, e.g., Hopson v. [read post]
