Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 7,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2008, 7:32 am
Well, the public asked for it...You see folks, if you have EVER been convicted of a felony, in the past (retroactive), you will now be punished again. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
“So you’re saying, snitches get ditches? [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:10 pm
This can include subscription services, dining out, or impulse purchases.Once expenses have been thoroughly analyzed, it’s time to make some tough decisions about what can be cut. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:28 pm
The company went public a few years later, in 2002, and now reports over a billion dollars in annual sales. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:30 pm
“It will have to be raised in the right context and at a time when the court feels receptive to re-examining its earlier decisions,” says Janus. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 7:07 am
(A Rite Aid spokeswoman declined to confirm the tally, saying the company hadn’t yet made the results of the meeting public.) [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:42 am
The conservative re-evaluation of crime policy is not universal, of course. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:35 am
Not some bureaucrat or prison official. [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:05 am
And as the Bin Laden story illustrates, Twitter amplifies official news, but it doesn’t create it.) [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
Considers a broad spectrum of factors when making decisions, including public relations and policy, congressional actions, labor-management relations, economic impact and impact on other organizations. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
Considers a broad spectrum of factors when making decisions, including public relations and policy, congressional actions, labor-management relations, economic impact and impact on other organizations. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
"You just don't make quick decisions. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
A basic matter is ensuring there is, in fact, public access. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
” In a landmark Supreme Court decision, the Court made clear that the Speech or Debate Clause is not limited literally to Representatives and Senators and that individuals who are covered by the Clause cannot resist testifying before a grand jury about communications and activity not covered by the Clause. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Atlanta officials have not stated whether they paid the ransom, or even tried, but it seems that they may not have even had the chance; the attackers (who were, in a rare instance, allegedly caught) quickly took the payment portal offline, and left the city to fend for itself; Ransomware payment can be in the best interest of stakeholders. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:36 am
Engaging at a leadership level with an array of public and private sector stakeholders on difficult national security and cyber matters at national and international conferences, in high-profile media engagements, in private meetings with policymakers and in other educational contexts. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:16 am
Engaging at a leadership level with an array of public and private sector stakeholders on difficult national security and cyber matters at national and international conferences, in high-profile media engagements, in private meetings with policymakers and in other educational contexts. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 1:27 pm
(See in Re Polson Pier Entertainment Inc.) [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 10:09 am
And later, they refer to public health officials’ “draconian legal restrictions”. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:24 pm
In response, Vance had asked the Center for the Advancement of Public Integrity at Columbia Law School to make recommendations for how to vet donors to eliminate potential bias. [read post]
