Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 5441 - 5460 of 8,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
But to begin, in this post I’ll discuss a couple of important preliminary matters that frame the unusual Article III questions in these two cases: I. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:15 am by Steven Koprince
No matter a company’s actual size, the company will be deemed an ineligible large business if it fails to timely respond to a SBA size protest. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:40 am by Veronika Gaertner
The article discusses both important decisions and pending cases before the ECJ touching the subject matter of the article. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 12:42 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
” Surely you won’t miss that. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
[W]e must assume that each word of the statute was used purposefully by the Legislature, see Platts v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:01 am by Heidi Henson
No matter what deadline the DOL ultimately sets, employers need to be prepared to include this in their communication plans for 2013. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:41 am by Eliana Baer
  I am sure we will see more cases of this sort in the future. _______________ Eliana T. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:27 am by Gregory J. Brodzik
Judge Andrews concluded that “[w]hile I am thus of the opinion that [plaintiff’s expert’s] testimony about damages should be entirely excluded, I also believe that my final decision on the matter would be better informed if I heard live testimony, subject to cross-examination, from [plaintiff’s expert], before the beginning of trial. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by John W. Arden
“[W]e made clear when the FTC started its investigation, we’ve always been open to improvements that would create a better experience,” the company said. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
… [W]e do agree that there is a problem out there—or if not a problem—it's a perceived problem with deceptive practices by some providers out there. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:03 am
  "[t]he issue before us is not whether a jury could find that Dr. [read post]