Search for: "In re John M" Results 5441 - 5460 of 8,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2010, 10:30 am by azatty
Escapee John McCluskey being arrested, Aug. 19, 2010 Can’t Arizona do better? [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:14 am by David Lat
The Biglaw break-off boutiques tend to be specialized, and they’re often (but not always) in areas that (a) don’t require armies of associates and (b) feature some amount price sensitivity by clients. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
"If I'm around in a leadership role come January, we're going to get serious about it. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 10:05 am by Steven M. Gursten
John Baker, a neuropsychologist and an IME doctor that I’d like to talk about… - Steven M. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:43 pm by Jeff Gamso
  His hero, it's said, is John Wayne, and I'm told he has a life-size cardboard cutout of the Duke in his office.But he's a technological John Wayne. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:37 pm by Ray
Me, I’m left wondering why anyone who cares deeply about getting their writing right would be so unwilling to re-examine what they learned in high school.My prior blog posts on this should-be-uncontroversial topic are here, here, here, and here. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(I’m not sure this is a satisfactory answer. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:01 am
Personally think Steve writes a better novel than does John, John writes for Hollywood, is predictable and Steve Martini for lawyers. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:55 am by PunditMom
” So, other than beating our heads against our computers as it becomes clear that even when we try to step up to the plate with the boys, what do we do to combat the fact that they’re just ignoring us? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Senior IP Scholar Session Paul Goldstein, Stanford Law School A lot of the industry-specific provisions of copyright have no present justification and should be tossed (e.g., cable licensing); mature industry likes settled rules, but that’s not good enough. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also: you get around §230, which is useful when you’re suing Twitter since the John Does don’t have any money. [read post]