Search for: "MARSHALL v. MARSHALL" Results 5441 - 5460 of 6,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright)   Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango)   China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon)   Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP)… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 5:20 pm by Fred Abrams
City of Tenaha Deputy City Marshal Barry Washington et. al., U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:18 pm
Last month, the White House’s Augustine Commission recommended that NASA scrap the Ares I and focus instead on the Ares V large cargo rocket. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
" (To read more about the case of Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
In June the MSPB issued a terrible ruling in MacLean v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:36 am
"Methinks this reporter nails it, even if their tongue is firmly in their cheek.Welcome to ABC's "V," the most fascinating and bound to be the most controversial new show of the fall television season. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:50 am
Proving such a claim can be difficult for an employer, but if the employer is able to marshall evidence of improper pre-termination activity (often learned through a forensic examination of the ex-employee's computer), it may be able to put a halt to anti-competitive conduct and obtain significant monetary relief. -- Court: Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Transferred to Law) Opinion Date: N/A Cite: Lawlor v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 12:42 pm
  It is questionable whether any political system is capable of marshaling the extravagantly complex and overdetermined series of relationships that drive global emissions into an effective consensus for change. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 5:38 pm
It's been settled at least since the Court decided Ford v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 am
The IPKat notes that the John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law ("RIPL") has just published the first issue of volume nine. [read post]