Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 5441 - 5460 of 10,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
Kerry, the Jerusalem passport case, and concludes that, “whatever the result, there will be several opinions and, regrettably, no clear guidance about the powers of the President and Congress on matters involving foreign affairs when the two disagree. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Law school is an interesting subject for discussion nowadays, with many people offering alternatives for how thinks work now—because how thinks work now doesn’t seem to be working. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:47 am by Brianne Gorod
That’s exactly what Chief Justice John Roberts doesn’t want, as he made clear in a speech last month; as the Chief Justice explained, the Court isn’t composed of “Republicans or Democrats,” and he doesn’t want it to be seen as a “political entity” that engages in partisan politics. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Buck 2007The Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood by Robert J. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
First Amendment Claims: The court says the key question as to Austin’s First Amendment claims was whether she was speaking as an employee on a matter of employment or a citizen on a matter of public concern. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:57 pm by Eliana Baer
  For more information about the changes to the alimony laws, you can find Robert Epstein’s blog on the issue here and the Family Law Altert by Eric Solotoff and Robert Epstein here. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:35 am by Richard Booth
It is not clear that it matters much because the Omnicare matter was before the Court on appeal from a motion to dismiss: The case remains to be tried, and the falsity of the opinions remains to be established as a matter of fact. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
  And so . . . everything matters, doesn’t it? [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:32 am
Its members follow voluntary standards, but CPSC officials say those don’t address key safety issues adequately, including vehicle handling and rollover. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:06 am
LaGrande (1979) 98 Cal.App.3d 871, 873, for instance, the California Court of Appeal held that "an unaltered awl is not a dirk or dagger as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:00 am by Jennifer Williams
On one level, this reversal isn’t hard to explain: few would doubt the necessity of the sanctions revolution that occurred in the initial months and first years following 9/11. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Wiley of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Health Law & Policy Matters Racial talk at work? [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Everyone knows that you don’t need a bribe in order to buy influence. [read post]