Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 9,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2020, 7:49 am
Moore v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v… [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
” It can help “legitimate” a terrorist organization, and also interfere with the United States’ diplomatic and foreign affairs efforts. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Could the United States find a way forward one year after the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attack? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
I agree with Samsung that the United States Patent & Trademark Office didn't accept or reject certain claim language with a view to an article-of-manufacture determination in a future damages case. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:44 am
The lawyers argue that even when false marking doesn't cause any "proprietary injury," it still has a negative effect on the United States, "which suffers injury to its sovereignty arising from violation of its laws. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:07 am
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI),… [read post]
14 Sep 2024, 8:30 am
Supreme Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, decided by the United States Supreme Court almost twelve years ago. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
Judge Susan Illston stated this was not a problem because the court could "group[] similar state laws together and apply[] them as a unit. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 2 WLR 857 The case concerns the UK’s stance on the application of mutual legal assistance to the United States where doing so may result in the death penalty being carried out. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
Twenty-four State Attorneys General signed an Amicus Brief in support of Arizona, as did the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
In 1853, Charles Bishop Goodrich published The Science of Government: As Exhibited in the Institutions of the United States, a popular early treatise on US government. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
An interesting case, Syed v. [read post]
