Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 55,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 7:07 pm
Utah Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
With the oral arguments now behind us, it’s anybody’s guess how the Delaware Supreme Court will rule in Sciabacucchi v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
Professor Nigel Bankes of the University of Calgary, Faculty of Law, has posted a comment on the recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Snopko v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:03 pm
As noted in my brief post of last week, the US Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision in Marrama v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:28 pm
See Yankee Atomic Power Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 5:21 pm
Our symposium will focus on developing issues in criminal procedure arising from the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Utah v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:31 am
Gates v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:43 am
Wood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:10 am
The case to be considered, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
Clifford Levy of the New York Times reports on a startling misuse of strong intellectual property enforcement powers against protestors in Russia:The group, Baikal Environmental Wave, was organizing protests against Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:48 am
In AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Blake v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Blake v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:30 am
They exercise only delegated power, the source of that power being the people. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:33 am
Regina (Electoral Commission) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court (United Kingdom Independence Party intervening) [2010] UKSC 40; [2010] WLR (D) 211 “Where the Electoral Commission brought forfeiture proceedings under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 against a registered political party in respect of its acceptance of an impermissible donation the court had a discretionary power under s 58(2) to order partial forfeiture of the value of the… [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:25 am
As is well established, judgments delivered in exercise of powers under Article 142 are not precedent and are generally not relied upon as having laid down principles as has been confirmed recently in State of Punjab v Rafiq Masih. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:49 am
Judge Harold Baer, Jr. denied class certification (and denied summary judgment) for the interns, relying largely on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm
Yet he saw its usefulness “to limit and qualify the powers of the Government, by excepting out of the grant of power those cases in which the Government ought not to act, or to act only in a particular mode. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Barclay v. [read post]
