Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 5441 - 5460 of 9,873
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:13 am by David Markus
In earlier decisions, courts have upheld the law.But that was before United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
And if the president and Bolton do decide to attack Iran or North Korea, will they do so in conformity with the laws of the United States and the law of armed conflict? [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Neil Kinkopf
  First, there is real opposition to the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Although the precise circumstances of the instant applications appeared not to have previously arisen, in analogous circumstances where a conviction was based on the law as it was understood to be, a subsequent change in the law would not be a valid ground for leave to appeal out of time unless substantial injustice had been done: R v Benjafield (Karl Robert) (Confiscation Order) (2002) UKHL 2, (2003) 1 AC 1099. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 10:24 am by Andrew Weber
H.J.Res.69 Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of the Interior relating to “Non-Subsistence Take of Wildlife, and Public Participation and Closure Procedures, on National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska”. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, covering the Abu Khatallah verdict, the presidential transition team emails, Section 702 and ACLU v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:10 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Earlier this week, Turkish Foreign Minister Menlut Cavusoglu said of the decision that “[s]tatements that have no legal binding will have no benefit, but they will harm ties...If the United States wants to worsen ties, the decision is theirs. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:32 am by Molly E. Reynolds
The bill’s inclusion in the omnibus is particularly notable because lawmakers were facing a ticking clock: The CLOUD Act, if passed, would moot the upcoming Supreme Court decision on cross-border data access in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:20 pm by Benjamin Pollard
The United States repatriated Assadullah Haroon Gul, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee, writes the New York Times. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn flagged Judge Cooper’s latest opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
Roberts  questioned a civil rights lawyer defending Section 5, Debo P. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear:  the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]