Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 5441 - 5460 of 11,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2016, 5:52 am
While a text shown to have originated from a particular individual's cell phone might point to him or her as the probable author of that message, the proponent needs other authenticating information, given that someone else could have used the individual's phone. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s a problem w/voluntary agreements w/o public. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Examples w/Google’s Content Verification—you can’t do it as an individual. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Bathrooms have been at the center of several recent controversies—most notably, of course, involving North Carolina’s HB2, an unconstitutional law that prevents transgender individuals from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity at any public school or university and in any governmental building. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Notice and takedown doesn’t work, especially for individual creators. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Under some voluntary frameworks, you may see those notices forwarded on to the individual subscriber. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Too easy to retransmit and display images w/o attribution, to strip metadata; there’s no ease of enforcement. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:13 pm by James Minick
Asked officer half way through both the W&T and 1LS how to complete the test. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
 The Court of Appeals outlined the standards governing consent searches under Constitutional and North Carolina law:Generally, if an individual consents to a search of himself or of his property, the Fourth Amendment is not implicated. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:44 am by Olivier Moréteau
Maphalle, University of Cape Town (South Africa)·         Judicial Protection of Women’s Matrimonial Property Rights in NigeriaAnthony C. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:03 am by Timothy J. Petty
According to the Court’s much-anticipated opinion, the answer is yes: “Its permissibility turns not on the form a proceeding takes – be it a class or individual action – but on the degree to which the evidence is reliable in proving or disproving the elements of the relevant cause of action. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s a big presumption to make to say that commercial speech doctrine will remain; that’s a fair point, but for now it’s ordinary to deal w/doctrinal interactions. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Caronia, where an individual successfully challenges the FDA’s off-label speech rules. [read post]