Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 5441 - 5460
of 6,067
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
New York State Restaurant Assoc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
By Dale C. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Excess Copyright) Copyright and Canada’s trade deficit – Cui bono? [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:56 pm
C. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
C. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:20 am
" The Supreme Court's decision in New York Times v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
(Aw, c'mon, innovator clients! [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
If certification is denied, these cases wither on the vine.[5] C. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
I also fail to see any evidence that the agents were dilatory in investigating the initial information that had been given to them about the defendant's sale of crack cocaine. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
Hickey, Roger C. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:25 pm
Admittedly rather confused by the English translation of the Advocate General Mengozzi's recommendation in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd, trading as "Honey pot cosmetic & Perfumery Sales"), Starion International, this German Kat has had a look at… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:39 am
This afternoon, after an interminable delay, the Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi of the Court of Justice of the European Communities was finally posted on the Curia website in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd, trading as "Honey pot cosmetic & Perfumery… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
The defendant’s Constitutional challenge was based upon the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Furthermore, we conclude that, because "the analysis employed by this [C]ourt in the prior appeal no longer reflects the current state of the law, the doctrine of law of the case should not be invoked to preclude reconsideration of" Charter Oak's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages (Szajna v Rand, 131 AD2d 840, 840; see Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d 887, lv denied 56 NY2d 507). [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
See Eurowest Cinemas LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:29 pm
Under Section 502(c), the operating agreement may specify the consequences of a member's failure to contribute, including a reduction of the member's interest, a forced sale of the interest, or even a forfeiture of the interest. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:28 pm
While the parties in this case alluded to an agreement between plaintiff, defendant, and plaintiff’s parents for the purchase of the former marital residence, no written agreement for the purchase and sale thereof was presented to the court. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 10:28 am
P’ship v. 25 Mass. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:50 pm
Judge Easterbrook's language in Doe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:03 am
The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Gantler v. [read post]
