Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5441 - 5460
of 10,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
Here’s the abstract of Reining in the Purcell Principle: About a month before the 2014 election, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of four extraordinary orders in election law cases. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Judge Anna Brown begins with a recitation of the facts, briefly summarized here: Latif and the other plaintiffs, all citizens of the United States, were prevented from boarding flights over U.S. airspace since 2009. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
Given that Starbucks has more than 13,000 stores in the United States this isn’t exactly a victory for the disabled. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 8:43 pm
He proclaimed Islam as the State religion. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:33 am
The interesting case of West v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
United States The mother of a popular YouTube personality sued a woman for defamation Tuesday, alleging she defamed the plaintiff on Instagram and published private information, including her address. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm
From Yeshiva Univ. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:38 pm
(Airbnb, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
(This is a short version of the FULL ARTICLE posted on the SSRN (pdf.). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 am
” And in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
United States (346 U.S. 15, June 8, 1953), a 4-3 opinion, it accepted the Circuit Court’s reasoning. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
".... ...As this Court explained in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:52 pm
In Burkhart v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 1:52 pm
In Burkhart v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 5:44 am
Theoretically, there is always the possibility of a detailed ruling stating hard facts or providing useful explanations in light of which an unconvincing short-form decision all of a sudden makes sense. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
