Search for: "Smith v Smith" Results 5441 - 5460 of 14,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
[This is the fifth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:41 am
 Arizona and the SG, and some of the other supporting amici as well, raise once more the supposed multi-witness problem – i.e., the idea that if the Confrontation Clause is deemed to require that an analyst in the position of Rast testify subject to confrontation then there will often have to be a parade of lab witnesses. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:20 am by SHG
 Summarizing Judge Leon’s reasons for not following Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:05 pm
Defendant could not suppress seizure of his telephone records from the telephone company under Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:10 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Supreme Court itself took a limited view of Mills in Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:24 am
December 19, 2007).* Seraches of police officer's office telephone records was permitted under Smith v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Matthew Lerner
 It's even more unheard of to have a dissent criticize the Court's internal jurisdictional precedent.Yesterday, Judge Smith dissented in Matter of Kachalsky v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 9:04 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  On Thursday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]